No. 10082
C. O.
10082
DESPATCH.
Governor.
No.
106
Date,
4 May 1894
Last previous Paper..
5677
Word tel
Further
14 June
B&L(78)-11217—8506-17-99
Next subsequent Paper.
10158
JUN
(Subject.)
Opium Ordinance
Sends memorial from Opium Farmers
praying for disallowance or suspension of
(Minutes.)
M. Wingfield
See also W. Watt's letters
that was not touched
and the new one, which is attached to 8677. There is nothing new attached to this.
The only new point I can see for mentioning it in the debate is that the Ordinance goes beyond the mischief complained of since it extends to Macao (not to Canton); more than in respect to smuggling.
Some Steamers go to both Macao.
The words "Canton and Macao" were new.
In S.38 of the original Ordinance, hence the mention of Macao is nothing why smuggling.
There is no reason...
Page 363
Page 363
Page 363
...
...
Page 363
nhang trong
No. 10082
C. O.
10082
DESPATCH.
overnor.
No.
sher 106
Date,
1894
4 May
ast previous Paper..
Goy
5677
Word tel
Further
14 June
avod 88:20 Ju
B&L (78)-11217—8506-17-99
ext subsequent Paper.
10158
JUN
(Subject.)
Opuim Ordinance
Sends memorial from Oppiem Farmur
praying for disallowance or suspension of
(Minutes.)
M. Wingfield
See also W. Watt's letters
that was not touched
wit
and the new one, hi which, attached to 8677. There is nothing new, attached to thin
Mis The only
new point
I can see for meminati had on in the debate,' is that the Ordinance goes begard. the mischief complained of since it extends to Macao (not to Canton); toto than in houspect anty
not merel
Suice?
Come Steamers go to both Mac
The words "Canton
Macac
ent
"were
new.
in 5.38 of the original Ordinance, hence the mention of Macao is nothing why smuggling
There is no neesm
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.